Posts Tagged MCO

A Bad Change for Ohio’s Injured Workers !

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

With the change in the ADR Process,  does the rule still apply that if the MOC does not respond to a C-9 within 10 days the service is approved?

Answer:  NO.  Now the MCO Policy Reference Guide says:

A medical service request will be considered approved and the provider may initiate treatments when all of these criteria are met:

(1)   The MCO fails to communicate a decision to the physician within three business days of receipt of an original medical services request or five business days if the request was pended;
(2)   The physician has documented the medical services request completely and correctly on a C-9 or other acceptable document;
(3)   The physician has proof of submission to the appropriate MCO;
(4)   Medical services are for the allowed conditions;
(5)   The claim is in a payable status.

In instances when a C-9 is not responded to within three business days and the provider initiates treatment, the MCO will provide concurrent and retrospective review of that treatment. If it is found before, after or during delivery, that any treatment, approved or not approved within three business days, is not medically indicated or necessary, not producing the desired outcomes, or patient is not responding, the MCO will notify the parties of the decision to discontinue payment of said treatment. Only charges for treatments already rendered will be paid. If the provider, IW or employer wish to dispute the decision, they may do so via the ADR process. The MCO shall obtain beginning and estimated ending dates for inpatient services if not provided on the request for medical services.

Previously, if services were approved, they were not subject to change. Now, approvals can be rescinded at any time.

In this ‘new’ era of Ohio BWC Policy, you need an attorney to represent your interests more than ever !

You Need Gruhin & Gruhin

© 2009, Gruhin & Gruhin Attorney's. All rights reserved.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Alternative Dispute Resolution Changes (When the MCO denies your Medical Treatment Request)

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Changes (When the MCO denies your Medical Treatment Request)

The Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation is changing its ADR process

In March of 2008 an internal audit of the ADR Process was performed.  The audit surmised that the timeframes for ADR’s are excessive; noting that appeal process could take between 73 and 261 days to reach a resolution.   Internal Audit Recommendations included:
Read the rest of this entry »

© 2009, Gruhin & Gruhin Attorney's. All rights reserved.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation – making a bad situation worse

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

deny injured worker benefitsThe current atmosphere at the OhioBWC is anti-injured worker. The MCO’s continue to deny requested medical treatment, the BWC is actively making settlements of claims more onerous.

Read the rest of this entry »

© 2009, Gruhin & Gruhin Attorney's. All rights reserved.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Ohio BWC Medical Care Organizations (MCO) – what the heck are they?

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Yesterday I got a call from a client informing me that he was called by his MCO and was told that he is putting his company out of business because, through our office, the client was awarded his permanent partial compensation benefit (the money for his injury). Imagine my surprise at such a conversation which was initiated by an entity whose only job is to oversee medical treatment authorizations and payment for such treatment.

My client felt bad about the call from the MCO until I explained who/what the MCO is/does. And why such information from the MCO is inaccurate.

Read the rest of this entry »

© 2009, Gruhin & Gruhin Attorney's. All rights reserved.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Ohio Workers’ Comp – The C9 Form and The Importance of the Fax Transmittal Sheet

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 7.0/10 (1 vote cast)

fax transmittalI was called by a prospective client about her BWC claim and the fact that she could not get authorized for treatment. After talking to her for a few minutes it became obvious that I needed to speak with her doctor. So, I call the doctor and ask about the treatment that he requested on the C9 authorization form.  I was dumbfounded by his comments during the conversation! Here is the skinny on our discussion.

Read the rest of this entry »

© 2009, Gruhin & Gruhin Attorney's. All rights reserved.

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

10 visitors online now
0 guests, 10 bots, 0 members
Max visitors today: 13 at 02:26 am EST
This month: 20 at 02-01-2012 02:12 pm EST
This year: 51 at 01-01-2012 12:15 pm EST
All time: 130 at 04-04-2011 04:44 pm EDT